HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10224 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, we are of view that the present writ petition involves the disputed question of facts which cannot be adjudicated upon in writ jurisdiction. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a suit for damages or any other civil suit as may be advised. March 18, 2026 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shakil Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Shamim Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad