Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9598 (ALL)

SAHIL RAJBHAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/32851/2026 · 2026-09-22

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32851 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 93 out of 208) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant, as well as Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 69 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87 of BNS and Section 18 of POCSO Act, Police Station - Rampur, District - Mau, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the victim, in her statement recorded u/s 183 of BNSS, has not whispered a single word against the applicant. On the contrary, she has categorically stated that she left her house of her own volition and stayed at the railway station. It is further submitted that the applicant has no prior criminal history and has been languishing in jail since 29.07.2026. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the informant and learned AGA have opposed the bail application by submitting that the victim was 13 years old only. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, the nature of the offence, the severity of the punishment, and particularly the statement of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vinay Kumar Mishra Sahil Rajbhar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) the victim recorded u/s 183 of BNSS, this Court prima facie finds it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Sahil Rajbhar, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 23, 2026 Siddhant BAIL No. 32851 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad