Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9597 (ALL)

BRIJ KISHOR KUSHWAHA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/15344/2026 · 2026-09-23

Manish Kumar Nigam

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15344 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. By means of present writ petition, petitioner is claiming post retiral benefits. In this regard, petitioner has already moved a representation before respondent authority. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already approached respondent authority, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the above-mentioned representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kapil Kumar Soni, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Brij Kishor Kushwaha .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad