CRM-M-23933-202 IN THE HIGH CO (141) GURMEET SINGH STATE OF PUNJA CORAM: HON'B
Present: Mr. Har Ms. Ruc ****
MANISHA BATRA 1. The inst 528 of Bharatiya N quashing of the ord Special Court, Sri M Section 21(b) of Nar Station Gidderbaha, Balkaran Singh & A and bonds were forf ordered to be issued 2026 (O&M) (1) H COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR INGH @ GEETU Versus
UNJAB ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISH Harmanbir S. Sandhu, Advocate for s. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, P
ATRA, J. (ORAL) he instant petition has been preferred b tiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 e order dated 04.02.2026 passed by Sri Muktsar Sahib in FIR No.84 date Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic baha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib in ca h & Another, whereby the bail of the re forfeited to the State. Now fresh ssued against him for 04.08.2026. ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23933-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent NISHA BATRA ate for the petitioner AG, Punjab erred by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) seeking sed by the Court of Learned Judge 4 dated 05.07.2025 registered under Substances Act, 1985 at Police in case titled as State of Punjab Vs. of the petitioner had been cancelled fresh warrant of arrest have been M) 2026 oner
dent ction king udge nder olice b Vs. elled been AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-23933-202 2. It is arg regularly appearing b appear due to noting intentional but was d proceedings before conditions to be impo allowed. 3. Notice o 4. Learned has submitted that t hence the same does 5. This Co parties. 6. On peru petitioner was cance none else had appear the impugned order a However, keeping proceedings before t conditions to be imp giving direction to th 2026 (O&M) (2) is argued by learned counsel for th aring before the Learned Trial Court. noting down some wrong date of h was due to the above-said reason. H efore the Learned Trial Court and e imposed upon him. It is thus urged otice of motion. earned State counsel has accepted adv that there is no illegality or infirmit e does not deserve to be quashed. his Court has heard the submission m n perusal of the impugned order, it i cancelled due to his non-appearance appeared on his behalf. As such there order and, therefore, this Court finds n ping in view the fact that the pet efore the Learned Trial Court and rea e imposed by the Learned Trial Court n to the petitioner to surrender before t for the petitioner that he had been Court. On 04.02.2026, he could not e of hearing. His absence was not son. He is ready and willing to join and to abide by the terms and urged that the petition deserves to be ed advance notice of the petition and nfirmity in the impugned order and ion made by learned counsel for the er, it is apparent that the bail of the arance and also due to the fact that there is no illegality or infirmity in finds no reason to set aside the same. he petitioner is ready to join the nd ready to abide by the terms and Court, the petition is disposed of by efore the Trial Court within a period been d not s not join and to be and and r the f the that ity in ame. the and by riod AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-23933-202 of 10 days from tod surety bonds to the s by the Trial Court. Legal Services Autho 7. A copy
30.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (3) m today and on doing so and furnish o the satisfaction of Learned Trial Cou ourt. He shall also deposit cost of Authority (DLSA), Sri Muktsar Sahib copy of this order be sent to the Learn (MANI Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
  
furnishing fresh personal as well as al Court, he shall be admitted to bail st of Rs.5,000/- before the District r Sahib. Learned Trial Court. ANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE es/No
ll as bail strict AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.