Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 959 (KAR)

N VENKATACHALAPATHY v. THIMMAIAH

RFA/552/2019 · 2026-02-20

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10512 RFA No. 552 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.552 OF 2019 (INJ) BETWEEN: N.VENKATACHALAPATHY S/O.SRI NARAYANACHARI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.388, 4TH CROSS 1ST MAIN, SHAMBHAVINAGAR PEENYA 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560 079 …APPELLANT (BY SRI B.N.ANANTHA NARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THIMMAIAH S/O.LATE ARASAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT JANATHA COLONY K.G.LAKKENAHALLI LAKSHMIPURA POST YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 022 2. N.KRISHNAMURTHY S/O.LATE NINGAIAH @ NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT JANATHA COLONY GIDADAKONENAHALLI VILLAGE VISHWANEEDAM POST BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 091 3. SHETTAPPA S/O.LATE HONNAIAH Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10512 RFA No. 552 of 2019 AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT JANATHA COLONY K.G.LAKKENAHALLI LAKSHMIPURA POST YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 022 4. SMT.VIJAYAMMA W/O.LATE M.REVANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.16, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN YELLAMMA TEMPLE STREET R.T.NAGAR BENGALURU-560 032 5. P. RAMESH S/O.LATE POOJAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.92, B.CHANNASANDRA BANASWADI POST BENGALURU-560 043 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.N.SHIVAKUMAR, SRI SHANKAR AND SRI M.S.VISHWANATH, ADVOCATES FOR C/R-5) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.12.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.198/2016 BY XXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH-38) BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10512 RFA No. 552 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo stating that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. The said memo is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4