KM. JYOTSANA UPADHAYA AND ANOTHER v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH ITS LOCAL DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/110/2023 · 2026-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 110 of 2023 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Rahul Verma, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Gopal Misra, learned counsel for petitioners, states that present writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
2. In view of the statement, so made, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 23, 2026 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gopal Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Km. Jyotsana Upadhaya And Another .....Petitioner(s) New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Local Divisional Manager And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad