Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:20343-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 399 of 2026 1 - Dewa Banjami S/o. Mukka Ram Banjami Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Durmasatti, Block, Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 2 - Narad Lal Taram S/o. Rainu Ram Taram Aged About 44 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Katulmiri, Block- Chhindgarh, District- Sukma (C.G.) 3 - Hunga Ram Nendi S/o. Kumma Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Tamiyapara, Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 4 - Mohan Rao S/o. Late Acchem Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Muriya Bhanarras, Block- Chhindgarh, District- Sukma (C.G.) 5 - Boddu Naresh S/o. Boddu Raja Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Nimalguda, Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 6 - Pradeep Sodhi S/o. Dev Ram Sodhi Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Kasarguda, Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 7 - Anusuiya Sodhi W/o. Pradip Sodhi Aged About 41 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Padwaras, Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 8 - Chandraprabha Thakur W/o. Vedprakash Thakur Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Mandirpara, Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.05.02 10:45:43 +0530
2 9 - Santosh Kumbhalwar S/o. Late Bhaiyalal Kumbhalwar Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Keshapara, Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 10 - Deepa Mandavi W/o. Ajay Mandavi Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Naveen Kanya Ashram Dubbatota, Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 11 - Paras Ram Thakur S/o. Subat Ram Thakur Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Singaram, Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 12 - Nuppo Dewa W/o. Nuppo Kost, Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Mosalmadagu, Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 13 - Shankar Prasad Dubey S/o. Gaya Prasd Dubey Aged About 54 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Kasaram, Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 14 - Lalita Payam W/o. P.Viraswami Aged About 48 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt.
Girls Ashram Bharaiguda, Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 15 - Kuleshwar Prasad Sahu S/o. Chaman Lal Sahu Aged About 41 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Turkapara, Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.)
... Appellants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its' Secretar, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Deparment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
3 5 - District Education Offcer District- Sukma (C.G.) 6 - Chief Executvie Officer Zila Panchayat, Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Janjpad Panchayat Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Chhindgarh, District- Sukma (C.G.) 9 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.) 10 - Block Education Officer Block- Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 11 - Block Education Officer Block- Chhindgarh, District- Sukma (C.G.) 12 - Block Education Officer Block- Konta, District- Sukma (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None appears For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.K.Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal,
Judge
Judgment
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
01/05/2026 1 Though four advocates have filed their Vakalatnama on behalf of the appellants, none has appeared to press this appeal, which is also barred by a delay of 66 days. However, I.A. No. 01/2026 has been filed for condonation of delay.
Considering that a similarly situated writ appeal, i.e., WA No. 193/2026, involving a similar issue, has already been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 13.03.2026 passed in WA No. 193/2026 (Pushpalata Manikpuri and
4 Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others), and further considering the reasons mentioned in the application (I.A. No. 01/2026), the same is allowed. The delay of 66 days in filing the present writ appeal is hereby condoned, and the appeal is heard finally. 2 The present writ appeal is directed against the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WPS No.13609/2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed. 3 Learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the respondent- State submits that the issue involved in this writ appeal has already been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 13.03.2026 passed in WA No. 193/2026, wherein this Court held as under:
“33. Upon perusal of the impugned order, we find that the same has been rendered by the learned Single Judge with cogent and justifiable reasons. In an intra-court appeal, no interference is ordinarily warranted unless palpable infirmities are noticed. The learned Single Judge, while dismissing the writ petition by the impugned order, has considered all the facts of the case. We do not find any fault in the impugned order. 34. In view of the above, the writ appellants/petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they are similarly situated to the petitioner in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 (Smt. Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others). Their claim under the Circular dated 10.03.2017 is, therefore, misconceived, and the learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition.
Accordingly, the present writ
5 appeal is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed.” 4 In view of the above, the present writ appeal is also dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 13.03.2026 passed by this Court in WA No. 193/2026. No costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu