APHC010461252026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7694/2026 Between: 1. MUDDADA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SANYASI RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2- VISAKHAPATNAM, ACCUSED 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 2. PRODDUKU SPANDANA, W/O REEMALA KIREETI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. WARD PLANNING AND REGULATION SECRETARY, 18TH WARD, ZONE-III, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY.DE FACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds High Court pleased to quash S.R.C.C.No.831 of 2026 on Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam City, arising out of Crime No. 2025 of Muvvalavanipalem offences punishable under Sahhita, 2023, insofar as the consequently discharge the Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7694/2026 MUDDADA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SANYASI RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 -4-50, 1ST FLOOR, SECTOR-9, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM, ACCUSED ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUVVLAVANIPALEM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. PRODDUKU SPANDANA, W/O REEMALA KIREETI, AGED ABOUT 30 WARD PLANNING AND REGULATION SECRETARY, 18TH III, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL VISAKHAPATNAM CITY.DE FACTO COMPLAINANT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the d in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the pleased to quash the charge sheet and all further proceedings in No.831 of 2026 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Chief Visakhapatnam City, arising out of Crime No. alavanipalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, offences punishable under Sections 21 and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahhita, 2023, insofar as the Petitioner/Accused is concerned, and ently discharge the Petitioner from the said proceedings, and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM MUDDADA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SANYASI RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 MVP COLONY, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC AMARAVATI, LAVANIPALEM PRODDUKU SPANDANA, W/O REEMALA KIREETI, AGED ABOUT 30 WARD PLANNING AND REGULATION SECRETARY, 18TH MUNICIPAL VISAKHAPATNAM CITY.DE FACTO COMPLAINANT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the of Criminal Petition, the the charge sheet and all further proceedings in the file of the Court of the IV Additional Chief Visakhapatnam City, arising out of Crime No.525 of City, for the Sections 21 and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Petitioner/Accused is concerned, and from the said proceedings, and pass 2 MRK,J Crl.P.No.7694 of 2026 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings, including the personal appearance of the Petitioner/Accused, in S.R.C.C. No.831 of 2026 2026 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam City, arising out of Crime No.525 of 2025 of Muvvalavanipalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 MRK,J Crl.P.No.7694 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Mr. S.Prem, learned counsel representing Smt. A.V.S.Laxmi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition, with liberty to the petitioner to work out his appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 03.09.2026 MDP