Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9577 (ALL)

RIHAN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22525/2026 · 2026-09-20

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22525 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.121 out of 131) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Umesh Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.562 of 2025, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and Section 38 of Aadhaar Act, Police Station Tajganj, District Agra, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations are petty in nature. An amount of Rs.2,000/- is stated to have been transferred to the account of the applicant in the instant case. The applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. The criminal history of twelve cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. He is in jail since 08.05.2026 and undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar Pandey, Kamlesh Kumar Bharti, Umesh Prasad Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rihan Khan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Rihan Khan, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 21, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 22525 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad