Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010020222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/581/2026 ICCO PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956REGISTERED OFFICE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021DISTRICT KAMRUP (M), ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDENT OF PUB SARANIA, GUWAHATI-782003, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY INDUSTRIES COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTGOR Page No.# 2/5 ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVT.OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K SARMA, MR D KALITA,MR H J TAMULI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S CHAMARIA, SC, AIIDC Linked Case : WP(C)/4889/2025 ICCO PVT LTD A COMPANY DULY REGD. UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 WITH ITS REGD OFFICE AT THE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA R/O- PUB- SARANIA GUWAHATI-781003 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE BLOCK D DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 Page No.# 3/5 2:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELEOPMENT CORPORATION O/O THE AIIDC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION O/O THE AIIDC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR D CHOUDHURY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/2120/2026 ICCO PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956REGISTERED OFFICE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021DISTRICT KAMRUP (M) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDENT OF PUB SARANIA GUWAHATI-782003 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS Page No.# 4/5 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY 06 2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 4:THE MANAGING DIRECTGOR ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVT.OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. A K SARMA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Page No.# 5/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 16.07.2026 Heard Shri H.J. Tamuli, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri P. Mahanta, learned counsel and Shri M.M. Zaman, learned Standing Counsel, AIIDC. At the outset, Shri H.J. Tamuli, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the brief has been taken back by the client. At this stage, Shri P. Mahanta, learned counsel has submitted that he has filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that I.A.(Civil) No. 2120/2026 would not be pressed by him. So far as the writ petitionsare concerned, Shri Mahanta, the learned counsel has submitted that he has instructions not to press the same.However, he has sought liberty to approach appropriate forum. Writ petitions accordingly stand dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. It is made clear that since the writ petitions have been withdrawn, any observations made by this Court in the course of the proceedings shall not cause prejudice by either of the parties. JUDGE Comparing Assistant