[2026:RJ-JP:25177] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9681/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17935U / 2026 Deshraj @ Bachiya S/o Shri Balbeer, Aged 28 Years, R/o Rayli, Police Station Harsora, Tehsil Bansoor, District Kotputali-Behror (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In Sub Jail-Behror, District Kotputali-Behror). ----Accused Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through the Public Prosecutor ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mamraj Jat For State For Complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Ms. Priyanka HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 20/2026 registered at Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 351(3), 352, 109(1) of BNS and under Sections 5 and 27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that similar situated co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court; that the name of the accused- petitioner is not in the FIR; that the compromise has been arrived [2026:RJ-JP:25177] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9681/2026] between the parties; that conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the contentions preferred by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there are three other criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant concurs with the fact that compromise has been arrived at between the parties so, she has no objection if the accused-petitioner is enlarged on bail. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record; that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2026; that the name of the accused-petitioner is not in the FIR; that the main allegation is on the co-accused namely Satayveer; that similarly situated co- accused persons namely Rajesh Kumar Urf Raju and Pratap have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.05.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 7613/2026 and 7614/2026 respectively; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Deshraj @ Bachiya S/o Shri Balbeer is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. [2026:RJ-JP:25177] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9681/2026] 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 108/KAVISH