Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 95679 (MAD)

V.Palanivel Rajan v. V.N.Sandeep (The Regional Manager)

CONT P(MD)/3314/2025 · 2026-01-30

B Pugalendhi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026 CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 V.Palanivel Rajan ... Petitioner Vs. V.N.Sandeep The Regional Manager The United India Insurance Silingi Buildings, No.134, Greams Road, Thousand Lights West, Chennai - 600 006. rep. by the Authorised Officer ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to summon the contemnors herein and punish his for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.16414 of 2024 dated 22.07.2024. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.A.Shayakan Standing Counsel 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court that the order of this Court in WP.(MD)No.16414 of 2024 dated 22.07.2024, has not been complied with. 2.The petitioner, claiming reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred by his wife, has submitted a representation to the respondent and the respondent herein by his order dated 03.05.2024 has rejected the same. As against the said order, the petitioner has filed a writ petition in WP.(MD)No.16414 of 2024. This Court by its order dated 22.07.2024, has disposed of the said writ petition by setting aside the order dated 03.05.2024 and directed the respondent to reconsider the claim of the petitioner. Now,the petitioner has filed this contempt petition that the order passed by this Court dated 22.07.2024 has not been complied with. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 3.When this contempt petition was taken up for hearing on 27.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore the registry has listed this contempt petition today, ie., 30.01.2026. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner is claiming reimbursement for the maternity expenses incurred for his wife. According to him, as per the scheme, medical expenses incurred for maternity is not entitled for reimbursement and the same is communicated to the petitioner, vide letter dated 06.01.2026. 5.In view of the above submission, this contempt petition is closed. 30.01.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 To The Regional Manager The United India Insurance Silingi Buildings, No.134, Greams Road, Thousand Lights West, Chennai - 600 006. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI,J gns Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025 30.01.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis