TENGA SINGH ALIAS LAXMAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./859/2026 · 2026-02-26
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9566 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9566 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:5788 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.859 of 2026
------ Tenga Singh @ Laxman Singh, aged about 60 years, son of Late Nagina Singh, resident of village-Bhelatand, Dhaiya Khatal, P.O. and P.S.-Barwadda, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-26-02-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.83 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 342, 325, 307, 333, 353, 427, 504, 188, 269, 270 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Epidemic Disease Act, 1897.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the accused persons; being member of an unlawful assembly attempted to murder public servant police personnel who went to place of occurrence to maintain law and order. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the co-accused has already been admitted to bail. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-23 of this bail. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.12.2025 as is evident from para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.83 of 2021 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 26/02/2026 Abhiraj/