Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9565 (CHH)

DEVASHISH RAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2133/2026 · 2026-04-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20389 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2133 of 2026 1 - Devashish Rai S/o. Dinobandhu Rai Aged About 48 Years R/o. Village P.V.-17, Gram Panchayat, Ravindra Nagar, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Deputy Commisioner Bastar Division Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 3 - The Collector District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pakhanjur, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - The Tahsildar/retruning Officer Pakhanjur, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Dilip Haldar S/o. Vinod Haldar R/o. Gram Panchayat, Ravindra Nagar, P.V.-17, Tahsil Pakhanjur, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title as taken from CIS periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate. For State-Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. GA. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/05/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.05.02 14:50:51 +0530 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby the respondents to conduct proper and fair enquiry in respect of complaint made by the petitioner for removal of encroachment made by respondent no. 6 over the government land khasra no. 482. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner lodged a complaint before the respondent authorities regarding the illegal encroachment made by respondent No.6. However, despite the said complaint, no action has been taken against respondent No.6. Therefore, the present petition has been filed. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the concerned authorities to consider and decide the said complaint and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Rukhsar