ARUN KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/14068/2026 · 2026-09-22
Siddharth Nandan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9564 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9564 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14068 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Report dated 24.08.2026 and the notification dated 26.08.2026 are taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Prem Prakash Yadav, Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioner and Sri Tanuj Shahi, Advocate holding brief of Sri K.Shahi, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent-Commission.
3. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-Commission submits that the expert committee has revised the result and issued a notification on 26.08.2026; by way of which question No.61 has been found to be outside syllabus, whereas question Nos.96 and 41 have been found to be correct. He has further placed before this Court an order dated 24.08.2026 passed by Lucknow Bench of this High Court in Writ-A No.7693 of 2026 (Praveen Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others), by way of which this Court while ascertaining the challenge to question no. 96 in the examination, for appointment to the post of T.G.T, has dismissed the writ petition on
24.08.2026.
4. Be that as it may be, now since the experts have also submitted a report finding the question No.96 to be correct, no further relief can be granted to the petitioner.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is consigned to record. September 23, 2026 S.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aalok Yadav, Prem Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Arun Kumar Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad