Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9563 (CHH)

RAM AVTAR v. SHRI DIKESHWAR SAHU

CONT/1334/2024 · 2026-04-28

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19862 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1334 of 2024 1 - Ram Avtar S/o Meghnath Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kumhadtola, Tahsil Lalbahadur Nagar, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Dikeshwar Sahu Tahsildar Lal Bahadur Nagar, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shri Anil Sahu Patwari, Lal Bahadur Nagar, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 3 - Teejan Bai D/o Paltu Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Katalwahi (Musara), Tahsil Dongergarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 4 - Rameshwari D/o Meghnath Aged About 35 Years W/o Yashwant, R/o Village Kolihapuri, Tahsil Dongergarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 5 - Shri Sanjay Agrawal Collector Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. -- Respondent(s) (The cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent No.1, 2 & 5 : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 29/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondents No.1, 2 and 5 would submit that respondents/contemnor have tendered their unconditional apology. He submits that on the date of passing of order dated 31.01.2024, respondents/contemnors were not made aware of the interim order of BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 status-quo dated 31.01.2024, passed by the High Court in S.A. No. 476 of 2023 and as soon as the order of High Court came to their knowledge, they corrected the revenue records and name of petitioner herein has been restored. 2. Learned counsel for applicant/petitioner do not dispute the submission of learned counsel for respondents No.1, 2 and 5 based on the documents enclosed along with reply. 3. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for respective, contempt proceeding initiated against respondents is dropped. Contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to respondents stands discharged. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram