16/04 2026 AD/06/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/5794/2025 HABIB MASUM VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Mr. Gaurav Das, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. Suman Dey, Advocate ……for the State Mr. Uttam Kumar Mandal, Advocate Ms. Udita Mondal, Advocate ……for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 (University) Mr. Sarwar Jahan, Advocate Ms. Mousumi Mitra, Advocate Ms. Sahina Parvin, Advocate ……for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tewari, Advocate Ms. Anamika Pandey, Advocate Mr. Aniruddha Tewari, Advocate ……for the Respondent No. 1 1. Affidavit-in-opposition, filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2, is taken on record. 2. Parties are represented. 3. Mr. Das, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the writ-petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed. 4. Mr. Jahan, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 6 and 7, admits the same. 5. Mr. Mondal, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 5 admits the same. 6. Since the matter has been resolved amicably between the parties, the allegations made in the writ-petition as well as in the affidavit-in-opposition, are deemed to have been denied. 7. In view of the afore-stated, WPA/5794/2025 is disposed of. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2