Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19404 WP No. 23187 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 23187 OF 2021 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
N.M.N.INDANE GRAMIN VITARAK, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. NAYEM BHOUSE N.M., S/O N.M.NABI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NO.1281/G/.1, WARD NO.16, HOSPET ROAD, KUDLIGI, BELLARY DISTRICT …PETITIONER AND:
AUTHORISED OFFICER STATE BANK OF INDIA, KUDLIGI BRANCH, REGIONAL OFFICE BELLARY …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.SHEELA DEEPAK, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE DRT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION ANNEXURE-D PENDING BEFORE THE DRT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19404 WP No. 23187 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking the writ of mandamus directing the DRT to consider the application at Annexure-D pending before the DRT.
2. This writ petition is filed in the year 2021. An interim
order was granted on 16.12.2021. Thereafter, on 20.02.2025, though the matter was called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On 18.03.2026, retirement memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is Allowed. As the notice is served on the parties on 14.03.2026, the matter was directed to be listed on 07.04.2026. On 07.04.2026 when the matter came up there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ today on 08.04.2026. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54