HOSIYAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/39008/2026 · 2026-09-22
Saurabh Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9558 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9558 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39008 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 4.9.2014, cognizance/summoning order dated 11.10.2018 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad as well as entire proceedings of Case no. 4054 of 2018 (State of U.P. vs. Hosiyar Singh and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 204 of 2014, under Section 304A IPC, P.S.- Mohammadabad, District Farrukhabad.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, chargesheet and entire proceeding, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Digvijay Singh, Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hosiyar Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 23, 2026 Shaswat NA528 No. 39008 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad