Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9557 (CAL)

XXXXX v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

CRM(R)/36/2025 · 2026-04-16

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16/04/2026 D/L – 257 Court No.28 S. Kundu C.R.M.(R) 36 of 2025 In Re: An application for cancellation of anticipatory bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483(3) of the BNSS. In connection with criminal Misc Case no. 40 of 2025 granting the opposite parties prayer for anticipatory bail under Sections 239(4)/126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/74/76/303(2)/ 351(2)/61(2)/3(5) of the BNS read with Section 12 of the POCSO Act. In the matter of: XXX …Petitioner. Md. Anwar Hossain Mr. MFA Begg …for the State. 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, although the State is represented. 2. It appears that on the last occasion i.e. on 02.02.2026 no one represented the petitioner or prayed for any accommodation. 3. Accordingly, the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail is dismissed for default. (Jay Sengupta, J.)