Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9556 (JHR)

GITA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD. THRO ITS DIRECTOR, MR. VIVEK KUMAR v. OM PRAKASH PANDEY @ ONKAR PANDEY

C.R./7/2025 · 2026-02-26

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5708 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No. 07 of 2025 Gita Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., through its Director, Mr. Vivek Kumar, son of Suresh Ram, having its registered office near Reliance Tower, Balumath, PO & PS – Balumath, District – Latehar. … Petitioner Versus 1. Om Prakash Pandey @ Omkar Pandey son of Mr. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, resident of village – Balumath, PO & PS – Balumath, District – Latehar; 2. Dayanand Pandey, son of Mr. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, resident of village – Balumath, PO & PS – Balumath, District – Latehar; 3. Panchanan Pandey, son of Mr. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, resident of village – Balumath, PO & PS – Balumath, District – Latehar; 4. Sachidanand Pandey, son of Mr. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, resident of village – Balumath, PO & PS – Balumath, District – Latehar; … Plaintiffs/Opposite Parties 5. Sarita Devi, wife of Mr. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, resident of Village – Kandri near B.Ed College, PO & PS – Mandar, District – Ranchi; 6. Deepak Pandey, son of Mr. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, resident of Village – Kandri near B.Ed College, PO & PS – Mandar, District – Ranchi; 7. Krishnadeo Pandey @ Krishna Nand Pandey, son of Pun Pratap Pandey @ Pun Prasad Pandey, resident of Village – Balumath, PO & PS – Balumath, District – Latehar … Defendant Nos.2, 3 and 4/Opp. Parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mohan Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Anish Kamal, Adv. For the Opp. Parties : None Order No.15/Dated- 26.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit itself has been dismissed under Order XXIII of the Code of Civil 2026:JHHC:5708 Page | 2 Procedure, therefore, this civil revision has become infructuous and petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision. 2. In view of the above, this civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated: 26th February, 2026 Sachin/ Uploaded on: 27/02/2026