Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 27111 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.
1. Heard Mr. Shailendra Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Mr. Adarsh Mishra,
learned counsel for opposite party No. 2. 2. Prayer of the applicant in the instant application is quoted herein below:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may very graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Complaint No. 1185 of 2020 (Prachi Singh Vs. Anuj Singh and Others), under Sections 498A, 323, 504 I.P.C. & Section 4 of D.P. Act, Police Station-Paikoliya, District-Basti on the basis of compromise application dated 06.11.2025 made between the parties. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the entire proceeding of Criminal. Complaint No. 1185 of 2020 (Prachi Singh Vs. Anuj Singh and Others), under Sections 498A, 323, 504 I.P.C. & Section 4 of D.P. Act, Police Station-Paikoliya, District-Basti on the basis of compromise application dated 06.11.2025 made between the parties on the basis of mutual consent, during pendency of the present application, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. And/or to pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case." Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Nath Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Adarsh Mishra, G.A. Anuj @ Santosh Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
3. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 jointly apprised this Court that vide order dated 14.08.2026 passed by this Court, the learned trial court was directed to verify the parties as well as the compromise so entered into between them. 4. In compliance of the aforesaid order of this Court, learned trial court has sent its verification report dated 01.09.2026 according to which the compromise was verified in the open court in presence of the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 jointly submitted that since it is a matrimonial dispute and the parties concerned have compromised the matter and the said compromise has been verified by the learned trial court, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, there is no reason to proceed further. 7. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Narindra Singh and others Vs.
State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat, (2017) 9 SCC 641 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan, (2019) 5 SCC 688 had categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another, [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that, since it is a matrimonial dispute and the parties have compromised the matter, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above NA528 No. 27111 of 2026 2
mentioned case.
9. Accordingly, the entire proceedings of Criminal Complaint No. 1185 of 2020 (Prachi Singh Vs. Anuj Singh and Others), under Sections 498A, 323, 504 I.P.C. & Section 4 of D.P. Act, Police Station-Paikoliya, District-Basti, is hereby quashed.
10. The instant application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed.
11. In case the terms and conditions of the compromise are violated by any of the parties, the aggrieved party may approach this Court. September 21, 2026 Kashifa NA528 No. 27111 of 2026 3 (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad