Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9550 (CHH)

ASHWANI KUMAR DADSENA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1548/2023 · 2026-04-30

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20399-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1548 of 2023 Ashwani Kumar Dadsena S/o Late Shri Gambhir Dadsena Aged About 56 Years R/o Amarpuri Chowk, Sundar Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Puranibhilai, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) 2 - Chhote Lal Chaudhary S/o Mahesh Prasad Chaudhary Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 24, Camp - 02, Purana Machli Market, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. C. Verma, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Manharan Lal Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Dr. Sourabh Pandey, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 01 .05.2026 1. Heard, Mr. S. C. Verma, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Manharan Lal Sahu, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Sourabh Pandey, Dy. A.G, for the Respondent/ State. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.05.02 11:30:51 +0530 2 2. The present Cr.MP under Section 482 fo the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be kind enough in allowing the present petition and to quash the F.I.R. dated 18.10.2018, registered by the police of police station Durg (C.G.). (ANNEXURE P/1) as PuraniBhilai, Durg, District abuse of process of laws. This Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to direct the concerned Police Station to place the due, proper, free and fair investigation report before this Hon'ble Court in the instant case. Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit may also be granted in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that in the present case, closure report has been submitted before the concerned competent Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, the present Cr.MP is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by out come of the closure report, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sagrika