KAKI CHALCHALI M E MADRASSA AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/806/2018 · 2026-03-18
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 955 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 955 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028842018
2026:GAU-AS:4028
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/806/2018 KAKI CHALCHALI M E MADRASSA AND 2 ORS REP. BY IT'S HEAD MASTER CUM MEMBER SECRETARY OF THE SMC, P.O.
KAKI CHALCHALI, P.S. 1 NO. KAKI, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM 2: TILAK CHANDRA BORA HEAD MASTER CUM SECRETARY OF KAKI CHALCHALI M.E. MADRASSA S/O. LT. LAMBU RAM BORA VILL. 3 NO. KAKI 1 NO. GAON P.O. THAISUPAR P.S. KAKI DIST. HOJAI ASSAM 3: MD. SHER ALI PRESIDENT OF SMC OF KAKI CHALCHALI M.E. MADRASSA S/O. LT. TABARAK ALI VILL. KAKI CHALCHALI MATIPAHAR P.O. KAKI CHALCHALI P.S. 1 NO. KAKI DIST. HOJAI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY., GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.
4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER IN CHARGE EDUCATION CUM CHAIRMAN DIST. LEVEL COMMITTEE NAGAON DIST. NAGAON ASSAM.
5:THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDU. OFFICER NAGAON DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 6:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NDC NAGAON ASSAM.
7:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LANKA DIST. HOJAI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MR M ALI,MR S HOQUE,MR S ISLAM,MR P K DAS,MS C KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU,SC, SEC. EDU.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 19-03-2026 Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the matter at some length, fairly submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate appeal before
Page No.# 3/3 the authority in terms of Clause-7 of the Office Memorandum, dated 22.09.2016, a scheme for amalgamation and merger of different schools. Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education is present. Considering that an appeal would lie before the Government in terms of Clause-19 of the Office Memorandum, dated 03.08.2021, which is pari materia to Clause-7 of the Office Memorandum, dated 22.09.2016, the prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate appeal before the Government.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant