Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 955 (CAL)

BHASKAR CHANDRA MAHATO @ BHASKAR CH. MAHATO v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(R)/26/2026 · 2026-04-07

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.04.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.9 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. C.R.M. (R) 26 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Boro Police Station Case No. 59 of 2025 dated 15.09.2025 under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(w)(i)/3(1)(w)(ii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 10/12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. And In Re : Bhaskar Chandra Mahato @ Bhaskar Ch. Mahato ... Petitioner. Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sougata Mitra, Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Ms. Soma Chakraborty, Mr. Subhadeep Maitra ... For the Petitioner. Ms. Sonali Das, Ms. Trisha Rakshit ... For the State. As the subject-matter of the case relates to provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 along with other relevant provisions, an appeal would lie under Section 14A(2) of the Special Act. As such, the application for bail being CRM (R) 26 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Petitioner would be at liberty to prefer an appeal in respect of the same order which was the subject-matter of challenge. Learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner is granted liberty to take back the certified copy from the department after the same being replaced by photostat copy. 2 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)