MD SAFIQUE ANSARI @ GUDDU @ SAFIK ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3854/2026 · 2026-05-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9547 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9547 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:13434] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3854 of 2026
------ Md. Safique Ansari @ Guddu @ Safik Ansari, aged about 29 years, S/o Salim Ansari, R/o Gopalpur, P.O.- Katras Bazar, P.S.- Katrasgarh, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
Ms. Diksha Rani, Advocate
Ms. Priya Saw, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-06-05-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.04 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.858 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted cash and jewelry from the house of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet charge-sheet has been submitted against him without putting him on Test Identification Parade as is evident from para-9 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.09.2025 passed in B.A. No.7568 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.12.2025 as
has been mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.04 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.858 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.05.2026-Animesh/