Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9547 (BOM)

A. RAJAK ABBAS SHAIKH v. SHABUDDIN MATIN SHAIKH AND ANR

APEAL/79/2011 · 2026-09-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

6-APEAL-79-2011 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2011 A. Rajak Abbas Shaikh … Appellant Versus Shabuddin Matin Shaikh And Anr. … Respondents —————— None for the Appellant. Mr. Onkar Bajaj i/b Priyal Sarda, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 17th September 2026. PER COURT : 1. When this matter is called out, neither the Appellant nor the Advocate for the Appellant are present physically or through V. C. mode. Mr. Onkar Bajaj, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, is present. 2. Mr. Onkar Bajaj, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and Mr. N. B. Patil, learned APP for the Respondent – State, by referring to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320, submit that these proceedings would now lay before the Sessions Court having Arjun 1 6-APEAL-79-2011 (CR).docx jurisdiction. They therefore submits that these proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court having jurisdiction. 3. In view of the above, the following order is passed :- (i) The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions Court, having jurisdiction; (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would be transferred or assigned, after re-registration of the same, shall issue notice to the parties to the said proceedings and thereafter proceed with the matter on its own merits and in accordance with law. (iv) Considering the proceedings which are now being transferred have been pending for some time, the Sessions Court to which these proceedings would be assigned is requested to make an endeavour to expedite the proceedings. Parties shall cooperate in the early disposal of the proceedings. 4. Criminal Appeal No. 79 of 2011 is disposed of. 5. Interim Application, if any, is also disposed of. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] Arjun 2 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.09.21 10:38:02 +0530