Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9545 (ORI)

SUDHIN S v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/1146/2026 · 2026-03-18

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.1146 of 2026 Sudhin S and others … Petitioners Ms. A. Pandia, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):18.03.2026 01. 1. Ms. Abhankita Pandia, learned counsel for the petitioners by filing a memo, which is taken on record, prays to not press the bail application of petitioner No.3- Vishnu M. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner No.3-Vishnu M stands disposed of as not pressed and the present bail application is only confined to petitioner Nos.1 & 2-Sudhin S and Sreeram B. 2. This is the bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioners-Sudhin S and Sreeram B for grant of bail in connection with Mohana PS Case No.208 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.75 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gajapati, at-Parlakhemundi, for commission of offence punishable U/Ss.20(b)(ii)(B)/29 of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 15Kgs 600Grams of Contraband Ganja and waiting for bus to transport it. 3. Heard, Ms. Abhankita Pandia, learned counsel for the petitioners-Sudhin S and Sreeram B and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. Page 2 of 2 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioners-Sudhin S and Sreeram B vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioners-Sudhin S and Sreeram B in custody since 11.11.2025 with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and the quantity of Contraband Ganja allegedly seized in this case being intermediate quantity and, thereby, the provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act being not attractable, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioners-Sudhin S and Sreeram B to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioners- Sudhin S and Sreeram B stands allowed and they are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Designation: Sr. Stenographer