Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9544 (UTT)

SURENDRA SINGH BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1685/2026 · 2026-08-20

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010148072026 2026:UHC:7513 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1685/2026 Surendra Singh Bisht --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, despite the complaints made by the petitioner before the concerned Police Station, no F.I.R. has been registered on the basis thereof. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of filing compliant before the Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 4. In view of the efficacious statutory remedy available to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available to him under Section 175(3) of the B.N.S.S., in accordance with law. (Alok Mahra, J.) 20.08.2026 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb739 3398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB9874463 51E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.08.20 17:21:45 +05'30'