2026:JHHC:2681 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.202 of 2020 1. Lakunda Devi, aged about 52 years, Wife of Sunil Singh, Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.O. Dariyapur, P.S. Domari, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 2. Chinta Devi, aged about 50 years, Wife of Raju Singh, Resident of Village Bijoi, P.O: Bijoi, P.S. & District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 3. Rina Devi, Aged about 50 years, Wife of Kanjay Singh, Resident of Village & P.O.: Kanchanpur, P.S.: Kanchanpur, District: Gaya (Bihar). 4. Sabita Devi, Aged about 48 years, Wife of sanjay Singh, Resident of Village: Ragullar, P.O. & P.S.: Chakur, District: Gaya. 5. Sunita Devi, Aged about 42 years, W/o Kanhai Singh, Resident of Village: Manjhanli, P.O.: Charan, Mahendra, P.S.: Amba, District: Aurangabad (Bihar) 6. Sangita Devi, Aged about 45 years, W/o Mritunjay Singh, Resident of Village: Kajhwan, P.O.:Arunda, P.S. & District:Aurangabad. 7. Madhu Devi, Aged about 35 years, Wife of Munna Singh, Resident of Village: Panchamba, P.O.: Japla, P.S.: Hussainabad, District: Palamau. 8. Matkani Devi, Aged about 80 years, W/o Late Kameshwar Singh, Resident of Village & p.o.: Poldih, P.S.: Hussainabad, District: Palamau. 9. Ramanuj Singh, Aged about 45 years, Son of Late Kameshwar Singh, Resident of Village & P.O.: Poldih, P.S.: Hussainabad, District: Palamau. 10. Lakha Devi, Wife of Jagarnath Singh, Resident of Village & P.O. Ant, P.S.- Deo, District- Aurangabad. 11. Urmila Devi, wife of Bhola Singh, Resident of village & P.O. Majhiwaon, P.S.- Arkhotha, District- Palamau. … Petitioners. Versus 1. Smt. Hridya Devi, Wife of Sri Raja Ram Singh. 2. Bhim Singh, Son of Late Fulan Singh Both Residents of village & P.O. Polidih, P.S. Hussainabad, District- Palamau … Opp. Parties. 2026:JHHC:2681 Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate. For the Opp. Parties : Order No.06/Dated- 3rd February, 2026 1. None appears on behalf of the opposite parties. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared and submitted that he has no instruction to prosecute this Civil Miscellaneous Petition. 2. As learned counsel for the petitioner has no instruction to prosecute this case, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Date:- 03.02.2026 Amar/ Uploaded