Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9541 (CHH)

KALIRAM PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/349/2026 · 2026-04-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20045-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 349 of 2026 Kaliram Patel S/o Premlal Patel Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Boriya, Post Baijalpur, Tahsil And P.S. Bodla, District- Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief, Directorate Public Health Engineering Department, New Mantralaya , Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Superintending Engineer Of (Administration ) Office Engineer In Chief Public Health Engineering Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer , Public Health Engineering Department, Kabirdham Near Mahamaya Mandir In Front Of Bisen Hospital , Kawardha, Tahsil And District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 6 - Assistant Engineer Public Health Engineering Department, Kabirdham Near Mahamaya Mandir In Front Of Bisen Hospital , Kawardha, Tahsil And District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Ms.Deblina Maitry, Advocate For Respondents- State : Mr.P.K.Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.04.30 18:18:11 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30.04.2026 1. Heard Ms. Deblina Maitry, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr.P.K.Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the respondents/State 2. The appellant has filed this writ appeal against the order dated 19.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No.3513/2019 by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner / appellant herein. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue involved in this writ appeal has already been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 28.04.2026 passed in WA No.344/2026 (Chatur Singh Rajput v. State of Chhattisgarh and others), wherein this Court held as under:- “17. This Court also finds that the learned Single Judge has taken into consideration all relevant aspects of the matter, including the earlier round of litigation and the directions issued therein, and has thereafter declined interference upon finding that the decision of the competent authority does not suffer from illegality, perversity or procedural impropriety. The scope of interference in an intra-court appeal being limited, this Court does not find any compelling ground to take a different view. 3 18. Consequently, in view of the foregoing analysis, this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned order dated 19.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge does not call for any interference. The writ appeal, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed.” 4. In view of above, the present writ appeal is also dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 28.04.2026 passed by this Court in WA No.344/2026. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu