HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9099 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.240 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station- Jhinjhana, District Shamli, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above- mentioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant was simultaneously implicated in three base cases, and on the basis of the said three base cases, the applicant has been now implicated in the present case under the Gangsters Act. Learned counsel for the applicant has accepted that except the three base cases mentioned in the gang chart, the applicant has no other criminal antecedents. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but does not dispute the factual contentions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Taking note of the fact that the applicant has only three base cases shown in the gang chart and all relate to the year 2024, where two cases being Case Crime Nos.527 of 2004 and 528 of 2004, both relate to a police encounter case. In the opinion of the Court, the false implication of the applicant cannot be ruled out. The applicant has no other criminal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shavej .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) antecedents except the cases mentioned in the gang chart. 6. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 8. In the event of the arrest of the applicant Shavej, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 21, 2026 S.A. NABAIL No. 9099 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad