Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 954 (PAT)

Santosh Dubey @ Santosh Kumar Dubey v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./19590/2026 · 2026-04-06

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19590 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2024 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1. Santosh Dubey @ Santosh Kumar Dubey S/o Ramayan Dubey R/o Vill- Tadwa Khurd, P.S- Guthani, Dist- Siwan 2. Vinod Dubey @ Binod Kumar Dubey S/o Ramayan Dubey R/o Vill- Tadwa Khurd, P.S- Guthani, Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the husband of the informant and Chandan Dubey and Mritunjay Dubey with sword and iron rod causing severe injury to them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and informant side are pattidars and there is a land dispute between the parties. Earlier also, a case had been filed by the present informant’s wife which resulted in a compromise Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19590 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 2/3 in a Lok Adalat. Subsequently, the present case has once again been lodged imputing allegations against the petitioners of assaulting the informant’s husband and her brother-in-law causing lacerated wound however, the injuries have been found to be simple in nature as would be evident from the bail rejection order. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the parties are pattidars having land dispute between them and the injuries are also simple in nature, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 309 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., subject to the conditions that: (I) One of the bailors would be the family member or relative. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19590 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 3/3 (II) The petitioners are directed to cooperate in the investigation/trial. devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T