Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9537 (UTT)

ECONOMIC TRANSPORT ORGANISATION ETO v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2221/2026 · 2026-08-18

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010129442026 2026:UHC:7423 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2221/2026 Economic Transport Organisation Eto --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Girveer Chand, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Mohan, Brief Holder for the State. 2. According to petitioner, he has filed an appeal under Rule 285(I) of Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 on 27.12.2025. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appellate authority i.e. Additional Commissioner, Garhwal Division be directed to decide the appeal at an early date. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with request to Additional Commissioner, Garhwal Division to make endeavour to decide the interim relief application, if filed by petitioner, within ten UKHC010129442026 2026:UHC:7423 days from date of presentation of certified copy of this order. 5. Additional Commissioner, Garhwal Division is further requested to make endeavour to decide the appeal finally within eight weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.08.2026 Mahinder