Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9536 (CAL)

MEENA PATEL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL& ORS

WPA/5911/2017 · 2026-04-16

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 16.04.2026 01 WPA/5911/2017 Saikat Mukherjee MEENA PATEL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Rohit Das, Adv. (Through V.C.) Mr. Indradip Das, Adv. Mr. Purbayan Chakraborty, Adv. …For the Petitioner Dictated by Sujoy Paul, CJ. 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of introduction of new minimum wages, the point involved in this PIL has lost significance and accordingly, he may be permitted to withdraw this PIL with the liberty to file afresh in relation to present grievance. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. PIL is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. 4. No order as to costs. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)