Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9532 (ALL)

MS SAYQUA INJEEL v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/23472/2026 · 2026-09-20

Vinod Diwakar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23472 of 2026 Court No. - 38 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. Shri Abrar Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondent no.1, and Shri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5, are present. 2. On the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore, the matter was fixed for today. 3. Today, when the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, even in the revised call, nor has any adjournment slip been moved on her behalf. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. September 21, 2026 Anil K. Sharma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abida Khatun, Maha Prasad, Mohd. Naushad Ahmad Khan, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Abrar Ahmad (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Ms Sayqua Injeel .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad