Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043912026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/839/2026 SAYAR ALI AND ORS S/O- LT. YUSUF ALI 2: SARAFAT ALI S/O-LT. YUSUF ALI 3: MAINUL HOQUE S/O-LT. BASIR UDDIN 4: SAIDUR RAHMAN S/O-LT. BASIR UDDIN ALL ARE R/O. VILLAGE - PUB KANDULMARI P/O - JUGIJAN P/S - HOJAI DIST HIJAI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781006 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HOJAI SANKARDEV NAGAR HOJAI DISTRICT- HOJAI ASSAM PIN -782442 3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER REVENUE HOJAI Page No.# 2/3 SANKARDEV NAGAR DISTRICT- HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782442. 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER VILLAGE AND P/O HOJAI DISTRICT- HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782435 5:MOHPARA JAMA MOSJID REP. BY HAZI ISHAK ALI S/O LATE MOBORAK ALI PRESIDENT MOHPARA JAMA MOSJID RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHPARA PO JUGIJAN PS AND DIST HOJAI ASSAM 782435 6:ABDUL JALIL S/O LATE SONAFOR ALI SECRETARY MOHPARA JAMA MOSJID RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHPARA PO JUGIJAN PS AND DIST HOJAI ASSAM 78243 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K A MAZUMDER, MISS R A CHOUDHURY,S A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 18.03.2026 Heard Mr. K A Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management, Assam, Page No.# 3/3 appearing for respondent no. 1 and Ms. M Barman, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent no. 2, 3 & 4. 2. The present Interlocutory Application has been instituted praying for impleading the opposite party no. 5 & 6 as party respondents in the connected writ petition being WP(C) No. 150/2026. 3. This Court has perused the contentions raised in the present Interlocutory Application and finds that in the connected writ petition, reliefs have been sought for against the opposite party nos. 5 & 6 and accordingly, they are appropriate and necessary party in the proceedings of the said writ petition. 4. The prayer for impleading the opposite party no. 5 & 6, as party respondents in the connected writ petition, has also not been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. 5. Accordingly, the applicant is permitted to implead the opposite party no. 5 & 6 as party respondent nos. 5 & 6, in the connected writ petition being WP(C) No. 150/2026. 6. With the above observations and directions, the present Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant