[2026:RJ-JP:25583] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9725/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18006U / 2026 Arjun Pandit S/o Jitendra Pandit, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Harijan Basti, Beawar, Police Station Beawar City, District Beawar. (At Present Accused Confined In Jail, Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Pachauri For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.63/2026 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 324(4), 189(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that no specific or omnibus allegations have been levelled against the present petitioner. He further submits that though there is an allegation that the petitioner caused life-threatening injuries but there is no medical opinion on record indicating that any of the injuries sustained by the injured were dangerous to life. He again submits that co-accused Sagar, Hemant, Akshay and Shubham [2026:RJ-JP:25583] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9725/2026] have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 13.05.2026. Co- accused Teekam Saras has also granted benefit of bail by this Court on 15.04.2026. The case of the petitioner is akin to them. Petitioner is behind the bars since 17.04.2026 though four cases have been reported against him, however, in all cases he is already on bail. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Arjun Pandit S/o Jitendra Pandit, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/74