SHRI. RAJENDRA DATTATRAY KADAM (SINCE DECEASED THR. LRs) v. SMT. LILABAI DATTATRAY KADAM (DIED) AND ORS.
SA/67/2016 · 2026-09-17
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9527 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9527 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
501-sa-67-2016.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.67 OF 2016 Rajendra Dattatray Kadam Through his legal heirs & ors ….Appellants Versus Urmilagouri Dilipsinha Mutekar ….Respondents.
________________________ P. D. Dalvi a/w. Mr. Tejas V. Shelake, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. N. D. Tiwari & R. S. Rajput, Advocate for respondent. Urmilagouri Dilipsinha Mutekar respondent in person present. _________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 P.C.:
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.
2. Mr. Dalvi, on behalf of the appellant, seeks leave to delete respondent No.3 (Pushpa Dattatray Kadam).
3. He submits that respondent No.3 has died and that she was unmarried. Her legal heir would be respondent No.2.
4. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. 1/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
5. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
6. Both the learned counsel have tendered the consent minutes of the order dated 17 September 2026.
7. Both the learned counsel submit that their respective clients have signed the consent minutes of the order. They identify the signatures of their respective clients and also identify the presence of their respective clients in Court.
8. In view of the same, the consent minutes of the order are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification purposes.
9. For ease of reference, the scanned copy of the consent minutes of the order dated 17 September 2026 is reproduced hereinbelow: 2/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx 3/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx 4/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx 5/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx 6/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx 7/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx 8/9 adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
10. All statements made in the consent minutes of the order are accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted.
11. In view of the same, the Second Appeal stands disposed of in view of the consent minutes of the order dated 17 September
2026.
12. In sequel, all Interim Applications also stand disposed of.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 9/9 adn