Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4965 of 2026
Decided on: 08.05.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Nirmala Devi
....Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Himanshu Thakur, Advocate Vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are some defects in the pleadings as some relevant
facts have also not been mentioned therein, therefore, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law.
2.
Granting such liberty, present petition to
disposed of as withdrawn.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
- 2 -
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner also prays that demarcation report appended alongwith the writ petition at Annexure P-3, be returned to the petitioner. Demarcation report Annexure P-3 be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner subject to supplying and replacing with duly attested photocopy of the same.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge May 08, 2026 R.Atal