THIRUMALA REDDY SHOWREELU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/24838/2026 · 2026-09-01
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9524 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9524 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010457522026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 24838/2026 Between:
1. THIRUMALA REDDY SHOWREELU, W/O. LATE N.RAJA PRATAP REDDY, D/O. T.P.INNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.24-1-591, OLD JUDGE BUNGALOW, MULAPETA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 524 001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 524 001. 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SRO-I, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 524 001. 5. SMT R K PAULINE, W/O. P.J. ROBERT KENNADY, R/O. 9TH FLOOR, H.NO.908, ANUPURAM DAE TOWNSHIP, ANUPURAM POST, TIRUKALIKUNDRAM TALUK, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU 603 127.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the orders passed by the 3rd respondent in dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner without giving an opportunity of hearing and without considering under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 vide
Proceedings SC Act No.850/E/2026, dated 19.08.2026 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently stay all further proceedings pursuant to the orders passed in SC Act No.850/E/2026, dated 19.08.2026 by the 3rd respondent till disposal of the Appeal pending before the 2 nd respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings pursuant to the orders passed in SC Act No.850/E/2026, dated 19.08.2026 by the 3rd respondent till disposal of the Appeal pending before the 2 nd respondent till the disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4th Respondent not to entertain any registrations with regard to the property to an extent of Ac.1-00 or 4840 sq yards and a constructed house with 7000 sft. Situated at Nellore Bit-I, Nellore Town, SPSR Nellore District till the disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
::ORDER ::
Heard Sri T. Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. Notice of respondent No.5 is dispensed with since no adverse order is passed affecting the right and interest of respondent No.5. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner filed a statutory appeal under Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 before the respondent No.2 against the
order passed by respondent No.3 vide SC Act No.850/E/2026, dated 19.08.2026 (Ex.P1). Pending the proceedings before respondent No.3, respondent No.4 – Sub-Registrar made a mention in the Encumbrance Certificate that “ENQUIRY UNDER PROCESS IN RDO, NELLORE RC.E.850/2026, DT:07.05.2026”. Thereafter, the endorsement was removed after the disposal of the application before respondent No.3. Taking advantage of the same, respondent No.5 is attempting to alienate the property of an extent of Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.102-2 and the house constructed therein bearing D.No.20-1A-875.
3. Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that the appeal is pending before respondent No.2.
4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping the writ petition pending and inviting a counter-affidavit will not serve any purpose. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of
learned counsel appearing on either side, directing the learned respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders in the interlocutory application, if any, filed in appeal, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent No.5 vis-à-vis the property mentioned in the appeal schedule, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within one (01) week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Thereafter, the learned respondent No.2 shall dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 02.09.2026 TVN
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
44 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 24838 of 2026
Date: 02.09.2026 TVN