SANJAY YALLAPPA DOULATKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
BA/873/2026 · 2026-09-17
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9523 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9523 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
44 - BA - 873 - 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2026 Sanjay Yallappa Doulatkar … Applicant Versus. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents ----- Mr. Pratik Tare (through V.C.) for the Applicant. Mr. C. D. Mali, APP for the State. M. V. Biranje, Head Constable, Shiroli MIDC Police Station, is present. -----
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the State.
2. By this Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantive relief:
“a) That the Applicant be enlarged on bail with Shiroli MIDC Police Station bearing C.R. No.245 of 2025 for offences punishable u/s. 143(2), (3) r/w. 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and u/s. 4 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. That interim and interim relief may be granted in terms of prayer clause (a).”
3. At the outset, Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the State, submits that if the Applicant intends to file a fresh Bail Application in exercise of VRJ 1 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed by VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2026.09.21 10:34:35 +0530
44 - BA - 873 - 2026.doc the liberty granted by this Court in Bail Application No. 3755 of 2025, the Applicant must first file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court.
4. Faced with the said objection, Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw this Bail Application and to approach the Trial Court with a fresh Bail Application, in terms of the liberty granted by this Court vide
order dated 11th February 2026 passed in Bail Application No. 3755 of
2025. Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the State, does not oppose this request of Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application, with liberty to approach the Trial Court with a fresh Bail Application, in terms of the liberty granted in Bail Application No. 3755 of 2025. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
6. Bail Application No. 873 of 2026 stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) VRJ 2