Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9520 (RAJ)

MUNNI W/O MUNSAF ALI @ MUNSHA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8410/2026 · 2026-07-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25581] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8410/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15331U / 2026 Munni W/o Munsaf Ali @ Munsha, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Binva Police Station Firozpur District Nuh (Haryana) (Accused In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.232/2019 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Bharatpur for offences under Section 365 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the present petitioner is that she is involved in the murder of the deceased-Waseem. The petitioner is a woman aged about 60 years. He contends that principal offender Raheesh has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.11.2022. Co-accused Noora also got benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.04.2022. [2026:RJ-JP:25581] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8410/2026] Other co-accused Shahild also got benefit of baili by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order 23.05.2024. Co-accused Mausam and Sahruna have also been enlarged on bail by this Court on 25.03.2026 and 22.05.2026 respectively. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 10.05.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Munni W/o Munsaf Ali @ Munsha, be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/72