Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9519 (ALL)

RAMESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/38604/2026 · 2026-09-20

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38604 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. On the request of learned counsel for applicant, this matter is being taken up out of turn considering the urgency. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 3. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Case no.55514 of 2026 (State Vs. Shankar and Others) arising out Case Crime No.163 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 333, 352, 351(2), 110 BNS, Police Station- Goverdhan, District- Mathura, pending before learned court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.4, Mathura, including charge sheet dated 16.04.2026 and cognizance/ summoning order dated 26.05.2026. 4. On perusal of entire record appended with the instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet, cognizance/summoning order and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 5. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bindeshwari Prasad Mishra, G.A. Ramesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and Another, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773. 8. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 21, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 38604 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad