16.04.2026 Serial no. 45 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 588 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with GR Case No. 2013 of 2025 arising out of Nabagram PS Case No. 257 of 2025 dated 03.05.2025 u/s 109/117(2)/118(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. -And- In the matter of : Jaharulla Sk … Petitioner(s) Mr. Soumik Ganguly Md. Golam Nure Imrohi Mr. Partha Pratim Sinha Ms. Priti Burman … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, ld. APP Ms. Singdha Saha … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2025 and has been implicated on the ground that he happens to be the father of the principal accused. Learned advocate also submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such, he prays that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary. There are statement of the eyewitnesses; some of the witnesses have implicated the present petitioner, while some of the witnesses did not implicate the petitioner. According to the prosecution, the genesis of the dispute is because of the wife of one Town Sk, who fled 2 away with the deceased for which Town Sk as well as his father had a fight with the deceased. Be that as it may, having considered that some of the witnesses did not name the present petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since June, 2025, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Jaharulla Sk shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Lalbagh, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned court and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior intimation to the learned court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 588 of 2026 is allowed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3