[2026:RJ-JP:24740-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No. 1371/2025 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No.192/2025 URN: SOSA / 2682U / 2025 Amar Singh Son Of Rameshchand, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Kheriya Jat, Police Station Roopbas, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Sever Bharatpur) ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Ms. Chanchal For State-respondent For Complainant : : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A. Mr. Jag Mohan Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 03/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 304-B IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused- applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that no case is made out against the accused applicant under Section 304-B. The allegation against the [2026:RJ-JP:24740-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1371/2025] applicant is that he has demanded the dowry for the purpose of starting a business. 4. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vipin Jaiswal Vs. State of A.P.; 2013(3) SCC 684 and Satvir Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab and Anr.; 2001(8) SCC 633. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 6. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that according to the statement of Dr. Ved Prakash Sharma (PW-25), various injuries were found on the body of the deceased. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that deceased died at Ahmedabad in unnatural circumstances and the complainant failed to inform the police at the relevant point of time. It was further submitted that the injuries on the body of the deceased were found to be ante-mortem in nature. 7. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 8. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, the nature of the ante-mortem injuries found on the body of the deceased and the statements of Dr. Ved Prakash Sharma (PW- 25) as well as PW-1 and PW-7, no case is made out for allowing the suspension of sentence application. 9. Accordingly, the suspension of sentence application is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Ritu/12