Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9514 (CAL)

MAYA SHAW v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

CRM(R)/15/2025 · 2026-04-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.04.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 124. Kausik CRM (R) 15 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Cancellation of Bail under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. And In the matter of : Maya Shaw ……Petitioner. Mr. Arijit Ganguly Ms. Debjani Sahu ……for the State. None appears for the petitioner or for the State. Mr. Arijit Ganguly, learned advocate who ordinarily appears for the State, is directed to represent the State. He is entitled to engage a junior of his choice. His appointment may be regularized by the concerned authorities. In view of the petitioner not pursuing the present application, CRM (R) 15 of 2025 is dismissed for default. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)