UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. NABAJYOTI BORAH AND 2 ORS.
I.A.(Civil)/1594/2026 · 2026-07-14
Mridul Kumar Kalita
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9511 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9511 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010087942026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1594/2026 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT 24, WHITES ROAD, CHENNAI AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, DISPUR, GUWAHATI VERSUS NABAJYOTI BORAH AND 2 ORS.
S/O SRI BABUL BORAH, R/O VILL-RAJAGAON, P.O. AND P.S- MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782105. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT- BARUABARI, P.O AND P.S -SONAPUR, DISTRICT-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:TAJ TECHNICAL SERVICES REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS- NEAR SUN WEIGH BRIDGE VILLAGE- AMBER JORABAT DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781022.
3:HILLS CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS- SHIVAM COMPLEX A.T. ROAD BHARALUMUKH ASSAM PIN- 781009 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS. M SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : MR M H AHMED (R1), I AMIN (R1)
Page No.# 2/3 In MFA Case No. 4252/2026 With MFA Case No. 4252/2026(Filing Number) With I.A.(C) Case No. 5007/2026 (Filing Number)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 15.07.2026 [1] Heard Ms. M. Saikia, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Ali, appearing on behalf of Mr. M.H. Ahmed, the learned counsel for respondent No. 1. [2] On perusal of the Office Note dated 09.07.2026, it appears that the service report in respect of notices issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are awaited. However, since the respondent No. 1, is the claimant, who has already appeared in this case, and, who does not have any objection for condonation of delay in this case, hence, notice to other respondents is waived. [3] After considering the grounds stated in the instant interlocutory application to be sufficient cause which prevented the applicant from preferring the connected appeal within the prescribed period of
Page No.# 3/3 limitation, the delay of 30 days in preferring the connected MFA is hereby condoned and this interlocutory application is allowed. [4] Let the connected MFA be registered and listed for admission after 3(three) weeks, on a date to be fixed by the Registry. [5] List accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant