UKHC010057332026 2026:UHC:7322 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/127/2026 Sudhir Kumar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. By means of the present application, the applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Case Crime No. 00614 of 2021, registered at Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 120-B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.05.2026, granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicant. In compliance with the conditions stipulated therein, the applicant has duly cooperated with the investigation as and when called upon by the Investigating Officer. 4. It has been brought to the notice of the Court that the investigation has since been concluded and the charge- sheet has already been submitted before the competent court. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, pursuant to the interim protection granted by this Court, the applicant has cooperated throughout the investigation and has not misused the liberty so granted to him. It is further submitted that the investigation has culminated in the submission of the UKHC010057332026 2026:UHC:7322 charge-sheet and, therefore, no custodial interrogation of the applicant is required at this stage. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that the applicant has remained protected by virtue of the interim order dated 13.05.2026 and has duly complied with the conditions incorporated therein by extending full cooperation during the course of investigation. The investigation has culminated in the submission of the charge-sheet before the competent court. No material has been placed before this Court to indicate that the applicant has either misused the liberty granted to him or failed to cooperate with the investigating agency. It is also not the case of the prosecution that custodial interrogation of the applicant is required at this stage. 7. Having regard to the nature of the allegations, the stage of the proceedings, the conduct of the applicant during the period of interim protection, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicant has made out a case for confirmation of the interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 13.05.2026. 8. Consequently, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 13.05.2026 is hereby confirmed and made absolute. The applicant shall remain on anticipatory bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the aforesaid order and shall continue to cooperate with the proceedings before the learned Trial Court. The learned Trial Court shall, however, be at liberty to impose such UKHC010057332026 2026:UHC:7322 further conditions as may be considered necessary in accordance with law. 9. Accordingly, the present Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed. (Alok Mahra, J.) 17-08-2026 SB SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c 24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A54 2D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5 DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.17 16:30:50 +05'30'