Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9503 (MAD)

Naseema Begum v. The Revenue Divisional officer

WP/10198/2026 · 2026-03-24

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.10198 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.10198 of 2026 Naseema Begum ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudhachalam Revenue Division, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District. 2.M.Mohamed Rafeeq ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of petitioner’s representation dated 12.02.2026 seeking cancellation of patta issued in favour of the 2nd respondent within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sunil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate [R1] Notice dispensed with [R2] ***** ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to cancel the patta standing in the name of the 2nd respondent for the Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10198 of 2026 property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representation, dated 12.02.2026. 2. The petitioner had given a representation on 12.02.2026 to the 1st respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. Since no adverse order is passed against the 2nd respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with by this Court. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with, after hearing the objections of the 2nd respondent and any other party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10198 of 2026 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation, dated 12.02.2026 seeking cancellation of patta standing in the name of the 2nd respondent for the property morefully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections, if any, from the 2nd respondent and any other party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 24.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudhachalam Revenue Division, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10198 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. sp W.P.No.10198 of 2026 24.03.2026 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis